Productivity features prevent your pipeline list from turning into a catalogue that is difficult to browse.
Save time with favorites and templates
Organize your recipes so frequent pipelines are easy to find and reliable variants are quick to create.
Show contents
Use favorites
Reserve favorites for workflows you genuinely run often. A short list remains more useful than a second exhaustive list.
Create templates
A template is ideal when the same structure serves several contexts: import, standard cleanup, and export, with a few settings that vary.
Keep one responsibility per pipeline
A pipeline should solve an identifiable goal. Several short recipes are often easier to maintain than one very long workflow.
Test with a small sample
Before processing a large file, validate the result on a few rows. The preview and local suggestions can help you spot empty columns or duplicates.
Time saver: state the purpose in the name and use a consistent convention across your pipelines.
A simple convention
Use a stable structure such as “data type - action - destination,” and add a date only when it genuinely identifies a version. Review favorites and templates periodically: a shorter catalogue reduces selection mistakes and makes important recipes immediately visible.
Organize a real catalogue
Adopt a convention such as “source - action - output”: “CRM - deduplicate contacts - CSV.” A template describes a structure to instantiate; a pipeline is a directly executable recipe. Do not turn every successful pipeline into a template.
Every month, remove occasional recipes from favorites, archive experiments, and review shared templates. Keep a small example file for important pipelines so that you can detect a regression after a change.
Common anti-patterns include names such as “final test 2,” chains that solve several unrelated goals, and copies that cannot be distinguished from one another. A short list, focused responsibilities, and clearly named variants provide more productivity than an exhaustive catalogue.